acroporas
Sep 5 2005, 07:03 PM
mever
Sep 5 2005, 07:57 PM
That is way better than I would have thought.....
acroporas
Sep 8 2005, 11:27 AM
Yes, the colour is not too bad, but I am not happy at all with my camera's performance at ISO800.
They look ok at this size, but at larger sizes the noise is pretty bad.
herbko
Sep 8 2005, 12:32 PM
I've shot at ISO 800 above water. It's not great but not too bad. I think part of the problem in your situation is that even with stacked magic filters the white balance has to amplify the red channel quite a bit and makes the noise worst.
acroporas
Sep 8 2005, 01:14 PM
While that is certainly part of it, the noise was unacceptable to me even before WB correction. Another factor was that they are underexposed by 1 stop. I should have used ISO1600. But I just couldnt make myself do it.
I was not surprized that I was not happy with the noise. Under most circumstances I refuse to use anything but ISO100. Even 200 is too noisy when I am conserned with image quality and at 400 I normally dont even bother.
Noise is one (of only two) feature that I look forward to improving when I eventually upgrade cameras.
herbko
Sep 8 2005, 01:29 PM
QUOTE (acroporas @ Sep 8 2005, 02:14 PM)
While that is certainly part of it, the noise was unacceptable to me even before WB correction. Another factor was that they are underexposed by 1 stop. I should have used ISO1600. But I just couldnt make myself do it.
I was not surprized that I was not happy with the noise. Under most circumstances I refuse to use anything but ISO100. Even 200 is too noisy when I am conserned with image quality and at 400 I normally dont even bother.
Noise is one (of only two) feature that I look forward to improving when I eventually upgrade cameras.
Looks like the 5D is the camera for you.
echeng
Sep 8 2005, 04:11 PM
Can you post a cropped 100% of the red channel? I would think that it would be really bad...?
I've found deep-water white-balanced stuff to be usable only for web display.
acroporas
Sep 8 2005, 06:11 PM
Yep, red is the worst by far, but the blue and green are unacceptable to me as well. Nothing that neat image couldnt fix but it still buggs me.
Alex_Mustard
Sep 18 2005, 10:27 PM
Wow. Those results are very impressive considering you are more than twice the maximum depth of the filter - and there must have been next to no red light at all. I am amazed that anything came out at all!
Alex
Kelpfish
Sep 19 2005, 07:00 AM
Has anyone tried this filter on big animals?
Joe
Alex_Mustard
Sep 19 2005, 07:44 AM
I think it will be awesome on whales, dolphins etc. I know we have sold filters to people who specialise in such critters. So you might start seeing images about the place. But I am not prepared to divulge names!
On Friday I shot Mantas with the filter in Bali:
http://www.amustard.com/bali_magic/Alex
JamesWood
Sep 19 2005, 06:06 PM
I'm impressed too. I bring my own light under such conditions.
For all practical purposes there is no red at the depth you were at. I would think that a warming filter would just cut the amount of light available for the exposure forcing you to use a higher ISO with minimal benefits yet your images do have some warm colors, especially yellow.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.