I returned from the Galapagos two weeks ago. First outing for the Subal and D2X.
There is much to like about the Subal housing, but there are a few things I didn't care for. These include:
1) The GS viewfinder. An expensive option, but incredibly frustrating. Even with a low profile mask, the image circle of the viewfinder only covers the entire rectangle of the camera viewfinder if your eyeball is dead nuts in the center. Anything other than perfect position yields a blurry section in your view. Quite frustrating. I wonder if it's the same with Seacam or if others have the same issue.
2) Handles. The two most expensive housings on earth are designed exquisitely, built to great precision and have god-awful handles. If not for the velcro strap, it would have been really irritating.
3) The MSC switch can be bumped quite easily. It can be pulled out to disengage, but it can also be easily bumped back and then switched. Then you must pull your glove off to pull it back out.
4) The neoprene cover for the dome port is pathetic. For whatever it cost, it isn't worth it. It velcros to the back of the port with two thin pieces of velcro, i.e. two small tabs. Get real. I wonder if a Seacam version would fit it?
5) The teeth on the zoom gear are much smaller than the Aquatica, therefore harder to mesh together when setup. This is offset by the wonderul design of the AF-MF lever than disengages the gears for easy insertion of camera and/or lens.
The housing held up nicely to a 4 foot fall off the camera table, although the dome shade is history.
I'm ambivalent about the front/rear command dial controls. With my Aquatica, spinning the front dial was a piece of cake, but you absolutely couldn't reach the rear dial with your right hand on the handle. For me, the Subal required me to stretch to reach either dial, but it was possible. It's probably easier for a long fingered person.
But, back to my original post title; Does anyone else have the GS viewfinder and what do they think?
