Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Using the "wrong" extension tubes in a bind
marpacifica
post Apr 15 2004, 11:19 AM
Post #1


Triggerfish
*
Member
Posts: 34
Once upon a time in the Northern Mariana Islands, but now bubbling in Boston



On a recent dive trip I didn't follow my checklist and forgot to pack the extension ring for my Aquatica 8" dome port. I did have the ring for the 105 mm macro flat port, so I just used that and the WA shots seem to be fine. The flat port ring is slightly longer than the dome port ring.

Now that I'm back home, I can't seem to find the dome port extension ring so it looks like I'm stuck with the flat port extension until I can get a replacement.

I don't see any noticeable focus or softness issues using the macro port ring. Has anyone else ever had experience using a non-specs extension ring when in a bind?

It seems a lot easier to pack one less extension ring, especially nowadays when weight and space on puddle jumpers is more of an issue.

Or am I missing out on optimum optics by using the slightly longer extension ring with the 12-24 DX and 8" dome port?


--
Nikon D3 & D700 (no housings yet), Fuji S2, Aquatica waterproof doghouse, Sea & Sea greased lightning, and a whole lotta shakin' goin' on. http://www.marlosarmiento.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 02.Sep.10-06:04

Wetpixel Quarterly
 

Join Team Wetpixel

Subscribe to newsletter

Follow Wetpixel on Twitter. We like Twitter.

MarineLife Keywords. Simplify your marine wildlife keywording!

SPONSORS

http://digideep.com http://backscatter.com http://divephotoguide.com http://seaandsea.com http://ikelite.com http://uwimaging.com http://gateshousings.com http://marinecamera.com http://www.inon.jp/ http://reefphotovideo.com http://www.amphibico.com http://www.aditech-uw.com http://www.watershot.com http://www.camerasunderwater.co.uk/store/

ADVERTISEMENTS

DiveFilm Video Podcast